De-coupling data from media buying – the pros and cons
Thanks to the rise of programmatically traded media, Agency Trading Desks (ATD) are able to access a lot of mobile data to help buy more transparently for their clients. But they need to take extra care with location data – it’s different.
It was just a matter of time. The ad-buying efficiencies offered by automated agency trading platforms, combined with shifting consumer device trends, has resulted in the merging of mobile and programmatic in 2015.
It’s obvious that programmatic advertising will become the basis of a growing segment of ad trading next year, driven by economies of scale and growing demand from transparency-hungry advertisers. The trend for digital media buying is increasingly moving towards the ATD model.
The rise of programmatic is also leading to a reorganisation of the entire mobile ad industry. More and more buyers and sellers are agreeing to deliver premium, direct-sold campaigns though programmatic pipes. Media agencies are aligning their trading desks closer to the research and insight business of parent agencies in an attempt to offer “real” value to clients. The end result could see the trading desks of today operating more like “technology hubs” – with the right pipes in place to drive optimum media spend on inventory for their clients.
ATDs are driving efforts to collect and use multiple sources of data across different screens in order to improve the ability to track users and increase the accuracy of targeting options via audience profiling. They also want to offer the most cost-effective pricing models they can access from mobile programmatic players.
The flexibility of programmatic, coupled with mobile-specific capabilities like geo-targeting, does create, at first sight, an apparently efficient method in targeting the right audience, at the right time and importantly, at the right cost.
So far, so good.
Marketers are following consumers’ mobile behaviours and that means delivering messages where the target audiences are looking i.e. the palm of their hands. Marketers can now merge and extend desktop insights by combining them with mobile-specific data sets like location, device, and content behaviour.
However, from a location data point of view, we know that ad messaging receives the highest attention, based not just on the platform delivered to, but also on an understanding of the actual physical location, both real-time and historical, the device user is in. Take a look at some Blis research we carried out on this subject earlier this year.
Demand-side platforms like Blis incorporate first party location data, second party behavioural, demographic and device data, and data from third parties that can better enrich user targeting.
Complex algorithms piece this data together and create a useable audience profile. Using data in this way significantly increases the transparency, efficiency and performance of a marketer’s ad spend by ensuring the delivery of relevant ads thereby increasing brand awareness, engagement and ultimately sales. Good news for us all!
As expected, the last 12 months have been a continuous evolution in programmatic. The thirst for knowledge and understanding from both agency and clients remains strong. Yet programmatic is still very much in its younger years and it’s only through open collaboration, de-coupling of data, and working in partnerships, that the greater opportunities will become apparent in 2016 and beyond.
Blis supports this collaborative approach and has made the best proximity location data available to be purchased by ATDs. We’ve de-coupled our data from media buying and now offer clients a Managed Service (Media and Data), as well as a Self-Serve Platform (Media and Data or Data only).
However, while programmatic may remove some of the middlemen from media buying, it’s by no means a replacement for entire teams.
It’s about workflow automation, not intelligence automation.
ATDs need to be aware that using location data to buy media programmatically is a complex process and one that requires careful consideration of the pros and cons.
We’ve looked at the pros above. Now let’s dig a little deeper into the campaign performance level.
Successful, intelligent, location-based campaigns consist of three main elements: Audience Targeting, Optimisation and Reporting.
Taking the data out of our platform will remove all users who are in the vicinity of Places of Interest (POI). In other words, no proximity. When device ID data is purchased like this it risks becoming stale over a comparatively short time period because the user will have moved on by the time the ATD uses it to buy media.
Secondly, it will also remove device/audience reach because the data will only have device ID’s up until the data moves out of our platform to the ATD. We can overcome this obstacle easily though by refreshing the data sent to ATDs, but it is potentially an issue they will face from other third party data providers as device IDs are passed on in various formats and match rates can vary considerably. The more devices, the better the reach and performance of a campaign.
The Blis platform is a “location-geared platform”. The crucial element of this is using current and historic location information to optimise campaigns. For example, if we are looking for ‘primary grocery shoppers’, our platform may establish that the best performing devices are those belonging to users who also live in affluent areas. Our platform has this residential IP device data and will therefore optimise to these devices, reducing wastage and maximising campaign objectives.
Taking the data without the other historic data we already have on that device, and putting it on a more rudimental DSP, simply will not have the location optimisation algorithms, or the data to run the campaign as effectively as we can as a managed service.
Our platform also tracks footfall – both before and after an ad is served – to determine what, if any, changes occur in consumer location behaviour during and after the campaign. We also report on the optimisation carried out by our platform around best performing locations, time of day etc. Taking the data out of our platform and into a vanilla DSP loses all of this.
Blis acknowledges that the current prevailing wind in the programmatic marketplace means ATDs want to be able to buy all kinds of data de-coupled from managed media buying. And we are facilitating this.
However, if the objective is a successful end-to-end campaign journey with optimised targeting, scale and reach, then taking location data out of our platform by itself may be detrimental to that objective across the board. On top of that we have a market-leading DSP connected to a bidder that does all of the above intuitively.
Blis has been doing this for years and we understand how location behaviour determines user context which creates audience insights. Think location is easy? Think again!
Tags: Ad buying, Agency Trading Desks, De-coupling data, Optimisation, programmatic, Reporting, targeting